From the beginning of time humanity has had to make choices. One of the most frequent situations of choice was one between restoring and/or rehabilitating or chucking it. When materials and expertise were not present in quantity and quality, the choice was much more severe. Possibly even reaching a point of absence of that item. Or, the possibility of happenstance attempts at restoring it to its function, hopefully to remain so for a long period of time.
We, or at least those of my generation and even into the generation below, have moments of remembering the repairman coming to the house with a bag of tools and replacement parts. Or, of loading those heavy TV's and cumbersome radios and cameras into the car and schlepping to the repairman. Hoping and praying that it could be fixed. At a reasonable price. Rather than being discarded. With the horror of replacement of buying a new one hitting us upon the head with a hammer. Money not available or free to spend upon non necessities of life, almost always led to the attempt to restore to working order. For as long as possible. Generally, with the members of the family standing anxiously alongside the home repairman or riding along in the attempt to restore it to life, a valuable component in the life of that family with the memories of it part of the family lore.
It was a pride of ownership. A reluctance to let something go, for the meaning behind it and its presence and existence within the household. It was also a society where the old adage of waste not, want not was still of active application and understanding. Purchases were undertaken not on a whim, but only after careful consideration and comparison. Of quality and cost. Of benefit. It was almost a tangible atmosphere of concern of the family as they watched an item go down the stairs and out the door. Perhaps to return, perhaps not.
Today, we live in a throwaway society. There's no patience to fix something. No patience to investigate as to exactly what the cause of the problem is, if it can be fixed relatively easily. Even when one desires to check the box first of restoration and rehabilitation, it is not so easy to carry it out in actuality. Those capable of restoring and rehabilitating are few and far in between. So many times, when an appliance is broken and the repairman comes to check it out, the conversation generally rolls around as to why it cannot be fixed. Why it would be only temporary. Why it pays to buy a new one rather than attempt to fix this old one. Always along those same lines. I am not even sure if the training programs for repairman of multiple types of items actually receive training in the art of repairing such. Far more capable of installing and explaining the newly ever more complicated set of directions necessary to start and operate this new item.
It is generally only when one ventures into neighborhoods where recent immigrants live, that one can find a repairman knowledgeable and capable of repairing and restoring. In fact, when one finds one of these rare treasures it is with a look of horror that they respond to your suggestion of perhaps one needs to totally discard it. It is anathema in their culture. There is no throw it away train of thought. Money and items are too scarce, too important and too difficult to replace without at least making a strong effort to fix the problem at its source. Then they are regarded as magicians and are given the title of "genius".
In the new development where we live in our other country, one has the opportunity to make that choice. If one ventures into neighborhoods of immigrants, or any monetarily challenged folks, who tend to think twice and then again before discarding a broken item, chances are there will be those folks who can repair and rehabilitate. Often quite successful in their attempts and restore it to its place within the hearth and home. At times one is amazed at how simple the repair actually was. And then wonders why the hell do we insist at present to keep on discarding items which can be rehabilitated. Whose materials are precious and non-renewable. Allow for pride of ownership. For the meaning behind it. To carry weight and to prevent waste.
Now transfer the whole idea of repair and rehab to humans, or the awful decision, the horrendous choice to willfully discard, dehumanize, and devalue other humans. Because of their differing appearance. Or different viewpoints. Or whatever. vile hook used to further the nefarious plans resulting from those awful choices made. The choices of humanity re humanity are heavily spiced and tainted with greed and hate and convenience. There are rarely, if any, valid reasons as to why we should accept a decision to discard humanity, rather than work to make it better. To always inch up the ladder of true progress. To reach the deepest depths and heights of goodness to be found within humanity.
Many will raise the rather righteous call upon humanity to understand that there are those within the mass who are neither capable of reformation nor willing or wanting to do so. These are the people who have, due to Nature and/or Nurture have declared themselves outside the camp of humanity. Who have given up all attempts to reform. Who have chosen of their own free will to continue on this path of no return.
However, before we assign one to be non-redeemable, one must be very sure of the righteousness and justice behind that decision. Even in a throwaway world we do not extend that way of life and thought to humans. It is only with hard and demanding work and process wherein we do our utmost, that a decision to outlaw one from the rest of humanity can be rightfully and righteously reached. The difficulty and the permanence of such a decision cannot be downplayed nor discounted. If and when one does do so, one is actually being dismissive of one's own humanity.
The question that arises is thus: What does one do with those who willfully, even with enjoyment, have declared and made themselves to be declared as outside the camp of humanity? What are we to do with such people who have denied their own humanity and then rage ruthlessly through the ranks of those unprepared and unknowing as to how to reckon with such violence and toxicity?
Those are difficult questions to answer. Yes, indeed there are people who are so evil that they have forfeited the right to deserve to live. The weight of that decision and its implementation lays heavily upon the one making and/or carrying it out. That decision diminishes one, causes a piece of one's soul and heart to shiver, possibly even break. But that is a burden which unfortunately those who have taken upon themselves the responsibility of protecting humanity will carry. It is we, the others, who benefit from these most difficult decisions, who owe them an eternal and endless, unmeasurable gratitude. Yet too often that gratitude is forgotten, even turned inside out, as we so often care to 'disremember' unpleasantness and pass the blame and consequences onto others, to rebound upon them, as all the while we act as if our hands were nowhere near the deed nor its inception.
This all leads to a necessity of a clear and definite definition, not politically influenced, as to what exactly is the line which must not be crossed in the determination of war crimes, crimes against humanity. These days we waffle and drift with the winds of the political nature of nations. These currents all too often result in fragile and incorrect definition and assignment of guilt. We turn blind eyes and deaf ears to the cries of those slaughtered. We ignore the truth. The perpetrators of these crimes are given a pass because it suits us at that moment to do so. Truth is pushed aside. Negated. And the innocents suffer twice over what should never have been theirs in the first place.
So often the ugliness that results from this playing around with truth, with convenience overwhelming all else, causes a blurring of the lines. Purposeful intentional slaughter of civilians. Gross maltreatment of prisoners of war. All are downplayed. Ugly and unfortunate realities of the world, of the nature of nations occupying this globe, skew the truth. Ancient and ugly tropes and memes of hate, toxic beyond understanding, rule the day. Falsehoods are passed on into the history books with terrible consequences.
One day, perhaps. we will all see the truth for what it is. The falsehoods for what they perpetuate and perpetrate upon mankind. One day we will know better. But until then how do we accommodate that which is right and deny that which is wrong? How is it possible to convince those deeply entwined in ugliness to forsake it. To come to that which is necessary for humanity to move forward. For all to live a better life. How indeed do we get rid of these prejudices? These venomous hates which periodically decimate the ranks of the people of this globe and inflict only more tragedy upon us all.
We did not know those answers yesterday.
We sure as hell don't know them today.
Will we know them tomorrow?
Not so sure, as we appear to be slow learners.
Too slow, in fact, for our own good.