MORE VOCABULARY LESSONS

     Yesterday, Olga asked several questions of David Israel re his statement that UCO is vigorously managing to interdict irregular call in channels so that Sheffield O renters cannot be called in. Well, besides the fact that one cannot block a person from his/her home, no matter the circumstances or path by which that residence became one's home, we now have another misuse of a term.  
     Interdict is truly defined as a prohibitory decree and arises from Roman Catholic censures having to do with burial rights and rites. Well, I am assuming we are not burying anyone at the gates or supervising burial elsewhere so what exactly are these bans we are using.? And, for that matter, what are irregular call in channels?
     Do we have tags on systems that say irregular? Do we have secret backdoor techniques of calling in, perhaps left over from the Cold War so spies should be able to escape the dangerous territory of Century Village? Is walking up to the gate and leaving names called irregular? Once a person is on the books as a legal tenant then he has all rights coming to him as a tenant, renter, owner, whatever.
     Quite frankly, the only way to stop anything is to stop it from happening and that would mean an increased awareness of WPRF and stronger and more alert and educated association boards, a process which is about three years too late. So please, David, edify us and please ''splain'" to us all about the irregular channels, what they are, how they work, why they were not used before, if they are legal, and exactly what are we "interdicting" and how? That would indeed be so helpful.
     It would also help some of your beat the drum friends as Gracie says the pot is empty so it cannot be stirred. Tsk, tsk, Gracie, wrong again. Your pot might be empty, but there is much in the pot of UCO that must be explained and needs to be stirred right down to their deep and murky depths. So sorry if that bothers you, dearie, but such is life. A little upset is good for the soul - forces one to think and evaluate one's priorities and morals.
     Then we also have this next brilliant statement.   "The biggest threats to our futures at CV are things like crazy paving lawsuits and irrational loudmouth morons who represent NOTHING at CV calling on local TV and politicians with demands that confuse the situation even more."
This is courtesy of our deep thinker of the nasty mouth, Petey Boy. so let us see if we can understand his statement or contention.
     Crazy paving lawsuits. Hmm. Aren't we about to have a meeting tomorrow for the Finance Committee and one of the main reasons so many are so concerned is because of the paving issue? Is it because David Israel et al finally had to fess up that good golly we actually do have a piece of garbage in our paving situation, that they allowed a substandard job to be done, did not properly supervise and now are first talking of bringing in an engineering firm - and we had better demand approval and provenance on that one! Is it because we now have to come up with millions upon millions of dollars - ranging anywhere from $15 to $30 million depending on the day and hour it seems! Is it because we now have to figure out how to cut this money out of the exhausted pockets of our residents. especially repugnant as all this could have been avoided or done properly with a proper job, proper supervision, proper everything! So, dear Mr. Cruz, what crazy paving lawsuit? If there is indeed an issue and there certainly is, what is crazy about it? All the contentions of the plaintiffs have been shown to be true so.....
     Loudmouths who call on local TV and political people? Uh, would that be in the same way that David Israel called upon 911 and the PBSO to be his enforcing posse, the posse that would intimidate those scary people with the canes and walkers? The same PBSO that finally shut him up? Or would that be the people we elect, or watch and whom we have to go to to protect our rights as they are violated here in the Village? Is it those people to whom we had to turn in order to get some attention at UCO, who when pushed to the wall, publically outed as liars and worse, finally HAD to do something? Is it the TV people who tried multiple times to interview our esteemed president of UCO, David Israel, who hid in his office and apartment like a scared little toddler afraid because he was found out to have stolen some cookies or spilled the milk?
     It seems that no one is confused except you and yours, Petey Boy. Sorry about that, but I am doing my best to clarify the language used by your master and helping him to understand the necessity of using precise language and full explanations. If not, we will continue to push and question, and yes, even have loud mouths, all the better to shout out the truth, whether it pleases you or not. Why not just shut up and read The CV Messenger for the truth? Why not eagerly await the next issue which will truly bust your chops and get ready to catch your eyeballs as they pop out of your sockets as more truths are revealed. Oy vey, but you guys are in for it. Truth will out again - as it always does. There is no hiding from it.
     But don't you worry. You just go on living your life for we have a bit of time to spare as the publisher goes on a small vacation. So just maintain your status quo and your misbeliefs for in the long run....well, you'll see. But not to worry. We will do the worrying for you. Have a good day.